Posts Tagged Internet

More on the Cato Institute hypocrites

Just a small update to my article on the Cato Institute hypocrites – you know, the folks who proclaim to be for individual liberty, but not when it comes to freedom of speech by one of their employees, even when he’s not speaking in an official capacity nor about any matter of which the Cato Institute has previously expressed any interest. Mr. Armentano has now written an article giving his side of the story:

Dom Armentano: UFOs and censorship — why Cato Institute dumped me

Telecom IS one of the areas in which the Cato Institute has weighed in with their opinions, and you get one guess whose side they are usually on.  The next time they deem themselves worthy to pontificate about some matter, I hope someone reminds them that when you act in a manner that’s apparently contrary to your core principles, you shouldn’t expect people to take you seriously.

By the way, and for the record, I believe that Mr. Armentano is right on with regard to his views on UFO’s.  I’ve never seen one, I don’t know what they are, I don’t know where they come from, and I’m certainly not so naive as to believe that if they are piloted by intelligent beings from elsewhere, those beings would necessarily tell the truth about their origins even if they did decide to land at the United Nations (however, it would be really interesting to compare their DNA to human DNA, and I suspect that’s exactly what some people fear would happen). But I do believe that the public deserves to be told the truth about what we know so far, and not be fed ridiculous stories about weather balloons and swamp gas (the latter is a local reference that will doubtless stir up memories for some southeast Michigan residents).  I, for one, am so sick of our government lying to us about everything under the sun (and maybe things on the other side of it as well).

I have read a few articles and heard some comments that suggest that if the full truth ever comes out, a lot of current and former government officials could go to jail (in part because of the way certain “recovered technologies” were allegedly handed over to major corporations). I don’t know if there’s any truth to that either, but I believe that those who have a story to tell should be allowed to tell it, without being penalized for doing so. One of the big reasons that this country is in such a mess is that instead of putting a high value on telling the truth – a core value that most of us teach our children – we tend to penalize people who tell “the truth, and nothing but the truth” (even if it’s the truth as they perceive it) in any setting outside of a court of law or a Congressional investigation. In line with the topic of this blog, I wish someone would blow the whistle on how telecom-related legislation is actually created – I think I have a pretty good idea already, but I have no proof.  It would be a lot more effective if, say, a former state legislator would go on the record about exactly how it came about that certain provisions got into the Michigan Telecommunications Act. But honestly, I expect we’ll see full disclosure on UFO’s before we’ll see that happen (which is to say, I’m not holding my breath).

Comments off

Did Comcast Hire Public Stand-ins For Neutrality Hearing? – Napping, disinterested attendees mysteriously appear, cheer Comcast – dslreports.com

You’ve heard of a denial-of-service attack – read the following and see if it appears to you as though Comcast might have taken the same principle and applied it to citizen participation. Or, if you’re of my parents’ generation, see if this reminds you at all of the days when union organizers (or opponents) would fill a meeting with a bunch of paid shills:

The Save The Internet Coalition, a coalition of consumer advocates like the Consumers Union authors of Consumer Reports and the Free Press, is claiming that Comcast bussed in a large number of disinterested individuals to yesterday’s public FCC hearing at Harvard on network neutrality and traffic shaping. The group is claiming Comcast paid these individuals so those seats would not be filled with interested, question-asking participants. Many didn’t even know what the meeting was about …..

Full article here:
Did Comcast Hire Public Stand-ins For Neutrality Hearing? – Napping, disinterested attendees mysteriously appear, cheer Comcast – dslreports.com

The real question is, are the FCC Commissioners so isolated from reality that they can’t figure out that this sort of thing might be happening right under their noses? I mean, if we assume that the critics have the right take on this, it would seem to me that once the Commission discovers that Comcast apparently believes their case is so weak that they dare not allow opponents to fairly participate in the process, that would work against them. I might be wrong, but to me this sort of seems like an admission that if the hearings are conducted in a fair and open manner, Comcast doesn’t believe their position will be the one with which the FCC sides.  But then, that (and everything in this article other than the article excerpt and link) is just my personal take on what I’ve read in the linked article. As always, feel free to leave a comment if you disagree.

Comments off

“Spam King” Ralsky indicted

According to the Detroit Free Press:

Michigan spam king Alan Ralsky , his son-in-law and nine others have been indicted in Detroit on charges of violating federal anti-spam laws, the U.S. Attorney’s Office announced today.

Full story here:
Mich. spammer, 10 others indicted in alleged Chinese stock pump-and-dump scam

Additional coverage and commentary on BroadbandReports.com

The trouble is, this type of action comes too late – e-mail as a means of communication has become somewhat marginalized due to the amount of spam. No matter how good spam filters are (and the ones on Gmail are very good), I find that some pieces of spam still manage to get through, while occasionally a valid message (sometimes one I would have really liked to have received) has been trashed as spam.  The worst part is that when you do send out an e-mail, you can no longer assume that the intended recipient actually got it, due to the spam filters.  So thanks a lot, spammers, for ruining a perfectly good communications medium (and the f***ing idiots that buy from spam ads must also share in the blame – how stupid do you have to be to do business with a spammer?).

Some readers may know that we used to have an e-mail mailing list devoted to Michigan telecommunications issues – it was strictly opt-in and contained no advertising that we inserted (although since it was hosted on Yahoo for part of its life, I know they inserted ads into some list messages).   Toward the end I got the feeling that although we had many subscribers, most of them weren’t actually receiving the list messages, because of spam filters.  The messages simply stopped arriving at some point, and people just assumed the list had been shut down, if they thought about it at all.  In a way, I think the proliferation of spam was what inspired the growth of blogs and RSS newsfeeds as ways to deliver news, information, and commentary to those who wish to receive it. So, today, we have the problem of receiving more items than one could possibly read in our newsreaders each day, instead of the former problem overflowing e-mail boxes, but at least it’s information users have actually asked to receive, with no spam.

Comments off

FCC Will Ban Exclusive Broadband Deals

BroadbandReports.com reports:

“For months, AT&T and Verizon have been asking the FCC to ban cable operators from maintaining exclusive service contracts with the owners of apartment buildings, developments and MDUs (multiple dwelling units). When the phone company asks for something, the FCC delivers …..”

Full article:
FCC To Ban Exclusive Broadband Deals – New rules to be handed down on Wednesday…

I can’t help wondering if the FCC would have been so eager to act if the shoe had been on the other foot; that is, if the phone companies had most of the exclusive deals instead of the cable companies. Still, locking renters into exclusive contracts that they never agreed to (and may not even have known about prior to taking out a lease) can never be a good thing, and this is at least consistent with prior decisions — for example, FCC rules that in effect say your landlord can’t prohibit you from putting up a small satellite TV dish on your balcony, provided of course that you are smart enough to insist on an apartment with a balcony that has a clear view of the satellites you want to receive (tough luck if you are on the north side of the building). Of course, it’s better to ask about such things before you commit to a particular space in a “multiple dwelling unit” — who needs to be fighting with their landlord when there are doubtless other apartments available?).

Edit: Followup article here:

FCC Bans Exclusive Cable Contracts 

Comments off

U.K. ISP claims chip used in about a third of DSL routers may cause intermittent connections

This was reported today in The Register (excerpt):

Zen Internet has uncovered a potential problem with the Texas Instruments AR7. The chip is at the heart of about a third of routers in use worldwide today – including Linksys and Netgear kit.

Zen has told its customers not to buy models that contain the chip because they provide an unstable connection.

Phil Long, a technical support manager at the firm, said: “The evidence is saying there’s something about these chips that causes intermittancy.”

Full article here:
ISP blows the whistle on router chip ‘fault’

The article notes that a list of devices based on this chip may be found here.  If you have one of these routers and find that your DSL connection drops intermittently, you may wish to try a different unit that does not contain this chip and see if it makes any difference.  We do not know under which circumstances this alleged fault might manifest itself,  nor what percentage of users of these devices might be affected.

Comments off

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 133 other followers

%d bloggers like this: